JavaScript must be enabled in order for you to use the Site in standard view. However, it seems JavaScript is either disabled or not supported by your browser. To use standard view, enable JavaScript by changing your browser options.

| Last Updated:22/04/2020

Latest News


Wildlife corridors with no legal status to come under panel's scrutiny

Wildlife experts on board the apex National Board of Wildlife (NBWL) will clear development which explicitly enjoy a higher level of protection under the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 or are mandated for greater safety by the Supreme Court.

Projects in forest patches, such as elephant reserve and green zones that conservationists  refer to as wildlife corridors but are not designated as special legal entities under the law, will not come under the purview of the wildlife board, the environment ministry has decided.

The NBWL is the apex wildlife body headed by the PM. Under various provisions and Supreme Court orders, development  projects falling in designated wildlife zones and areas  around these are required to be cleared by the standing committee of the board. The standing committee comprises several wildlife experts from outside the government  besides officials.

 Some non-government  experts had demanded that any area  suggested as a wildlife corridor-an area that wildlife animals use frequently but do not reside in as well as other wildlife patches regardless of legal Status also comes under their scrutiny.

But the environment ministry has decided that clearance from the NBWL standing committee shall be required only for national parks, sanctuaries, tiger reserve and corridors for tigers- all specially protected zones under the wildlife Act.

Elephant reserves alone are spread over more than 58,000 sq km and cover not only forest-bearing lands but also agricultural lands, villages and other land under revenue control. Elephant reserves are demarcated as an area over which states can spend the funds received from Project Elephant but do not enjoy any special protection cover under law.

wildlife corridors have been defined by conservation  scientists for various animals and are listed for levels of significance but the term remains controversial  in the legal domain as in several cases. the use of different criteria ends up providing varying indentification of these patches.

In an ongoing case before the Supreme Court, the definition of an  elephant corridor has ends up in huge controversy with many villagers and other standing  to be impacted by how the corridor is demarcated and then treated for protection of wildilfe.

                                                                    The Times of India, New Delhi, 20th December, 2012